Liam Broady vs Gabor Hornung Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 28 Aug at 11:51 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Broady vs G. Hornung

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

HUN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Broady 1 - 0 Hornung
They have played 2 sets in total, with Liam Broady winning 2 and Gabor Hornung winning 0. The last match between Liam Broady and Gabor Hornung was at the M15 Budapest, 29-08-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Liam Broady getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Broady | 1 |
| Hornung | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) M15 Budapest(08-29-25)
L. Broady vs G. Hornung H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,004,050 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 58.50% (530-376) | Career Total W/L | 51.76% (44-41) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 13 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
L. Broady vs G. Hornung Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Hornung has recently secured 40.68% of second serve points, slightly trailing Broady’s 44.37%. Could this give Broady a subtle edge?
- Return Game Strength: Hornung excels in returning second serves, winning 50.83% compared to Broady's 43.55%. Could this influence the match outcome?
- Pressure Handling: Hornung saves 54.55% of breakpoints, marginally outperforming Broady's 49.43%. Is Hornung more resilient under pressure?
- Overall Match Wins: Over the past year, Broady boasts a higher win rate at 60.34% compared to Hornung’s 52.27%, indicating a better overall performance.
- Preferred Surface: Both players perform best on hard courts, with Broady having a superior win percentage of 62% versus Hornung’s 56%.
- Level of Play: Broady has a stronger showing at Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, winning 69.77% of matches compared to Hornung's 52.27%.
- Opponent Quality: Hornung faces stiffer competition with an opponent average rank of 145.5, whereas Broady’s average opponent rank is 166.91.
- Deciding Sets: If the match extends to a deciding set, Hornung has a higher success rate of 64% against Broady’s 55%.
- Break Point Conversion: Broady is more efficient, converting 39.71% of break opportunities, while Hornung manages 29.17%.
Editorial Prediction (August 28, 2025, UTC):
Based on recent statistics, Broady has the upper hand in several key areas, including second serve performance and overall match wins. These strengths could provide a significant advantage in the upcoming match.
Hornung, however, shows superior ability in returning second serves and handling decisive sets, suggesting they could disrupt Broady’s game plan if the match becomes tightly contested.
Despite Hornung's resilience under pressure, Broady's superior performance in break point conversion and overall playing level in recent tournaments provides an edge.
Given the available data and recent trends, Broady is likely to emerge victorious in the anticipated match.
Liam Broady vs Gabor Hornung Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Broady vs G. Hornung H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 0:57:34 | Average Match Time | 0:57:34 |
| 80% (24/30) | 1st Serve % | 54% (20/37) |
| 58% (14/24) | 1st Serve Win % | 45% (9/20) |
| 100% (6/6) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (6/17) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (2/2) |
| 59% (22/37) | Return Points Win % | 33% (10/30) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Broady Recent Matches Played
G. Hornung Recent Matches Played

L. Broady vs G. Hornung Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.50% (530/376) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.76% (44/41) |
| 57.02% (1194/900) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.26% (102/97) |
| 52.98% (10430/9256) | Games Win/Loss | 50.58% (957/935) |
| 63.23% (282/164) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.56% (20/16) |
| 54.93% (78/64) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (21/21) |
| 60.35% (137/90) | Indoor Hard W/L | 42.86% (3/4) |
| 36.26% (33/58) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 2465 | Aces Total | 101 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 1576 | Total Double Faults | 137 |
| 1:14:22 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 514.76 | Average Opponent Rank | 192.18 |
| 63% (30207/48040) | 1st Serve % | 61% (1645/2714) |
| 68% (20601/30207) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (1043/1645) |
| 52% (9314/17826) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (476/1069) |
| 43% (2042/4741) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (100/266) |
| 40% (19013/47658) | Return Points Win % | 39% (1001/2551) |
| 47.27% (26/29) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56.25% (9/7) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45.98% (40/47) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55.50% (227/182) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67.46% (226/109) | Futures W/L | 51.76% (44/41) |
| 59% (519/878) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (44/83) |
| 35% (6/17) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 51% (137/271) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 62% (8/13) |
| 52% (141/269) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (16/29) |
| 87% (520/454) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (41/33) |
| 13% (520/65) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (41/7) |
| 20% (384/76) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (44/11) |